What We Learned from 5 Major TCPA Lawsuits in 2016
Last year saw nearly a 32% increase in number of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) case filings over the previous year.
Last year saw nearly a 32% increase in number of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) case filings over the previous year.
In the past, phone companies have used automated blocking tools, but some complained that FCC rules against blocking calls prohibited them from aggressively targeting illegal telemarketers for fear of accidentally blocking legitimate callers.
Del Valle v. Global Exchange Vacation Club. In this article, we examine a recent TCPA lawsuit to demonstrate the legal process for evaluating whether a case should move forward with class action status and touch on some simple things you can do to prevent cases like this before you begin your campaigns.
In Epps v. Earth Fare Inc., plaintiff Jalen Epps sued organic grocer Earth Fare for alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Ms. Epps claimed that Earth Fare continued to send her marketing texts, despite her many attempts to opt out.
Effective April 1, 2017, it will cost telemarketers $48,047 annually to access all area codes of the Canadian Do No Call List (DNCL) for scrubbing, an increase of $1,034. The annual access fee to individual area codes will be $2,875, an increase of $62.
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington just granted summary judgment for the defendant in a case that is great news for the dialer vendor industry. The court held that CallFire, a dialer vendor that simply transmits messages on behalf of their clients, was a common carrier, and therefore exempt from the TCPA.
The Northern District of California denied Facebook’s motion to dismiss a putative class action accusing the company of violating the TCPA. The plaintiff, Florida resident Colin R. Brickman, accuses Facebook of sending thousands of “happy birthday” texts without consent.