Skip to main content

News

News

2019 November Restricted Do Not Call Dates

State Restricted Do Not Call Dates

November 1, 2019 – All Saints Day

  • Louisiana (Statutory, not enforced)

November 11, 2019 – Veterans Day

  • Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Rhode Island, Utah

November 28, 2018 – Thanksgiving Day

  • Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Rhode Island, Utah

November 29, 2018 – *Acadian Day

  • Louisiana (Might be proclaimed by the governor)

Canadian Restricted Do Not Call Dates

November 11, 2018 – Remembrance Day

  • National (Exceptions include calls made at the request of the consumer)

State Restricted Do Not Call (DNC) Calling Rules & Exemptions

    TCPA Class Action Brought Against President Trump’s Campaign

    While some people may be under the mistaken impression that a non-profit entity such as a political campaign is immune from the regulations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), a newly filed class action against the literal President of the United States of America demonstrates that this isn’t true.

    Pennsylvania Set to Pass Stricter Robocall Rules Into Law

    The Pennsylvania state legislature passed a new bill, HR-318, that introduces a number of new restrictions for robocalls. The most notable is that it now extends the state-level Do Not Call List protections in perpetuity. Previously, those protections only lasted for five years unless renewed.

    2019 October Restricted Do Not Call Dates

    State Restricted Do Not Call Dates

    October 14, 2019 – Columbus Day

    • Alabama, Louisiana, Rhode Island, Utah

    Canadian Restricted Do Not Call Dates

    October 14, 2019 – Thanksgiving Day

    • National

    District Court Rules the Plaintiff Cannot Revoke Consent Through Strategies Such as the Use of a Fake British Accent

    The plaintiff in Johnson v. Capital One Servs., No. 18-cv-62058, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159633 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2019) attempted a novel technique in order to provoke Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violations from the defendant: trying to revoke consent by speaking with a fake British accent and telling the defendant's agent that they were calling a "wrong number." 

    Two New District Court Rulings Apply Statutory Definition of ATDS

    A year ago, the landmark Ninth Circuit decision in Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLC broadened the definition of what constitutes an Automatic Telephone Dialing System (ATDS) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Finding the statutory definition to be vague, the court disregarded the precedent of Dominguez v.